On law
The law says the MACC cannot interogate witnesses beyond office hours.
The Dumb takes this to mean that complaintants cannot approach the MACC office to lodge a report on corruption beyond office hours.
The Dumber expanded the interpretation to say that the police stations should close by 5pm.
On policy
All government projects would be open to tender.
The Dummy who introduced this policy then allows one of his Ministries to wrap up RM15 billion worth of gifts in return for a RM625m “remuneration” paid by a 24 year old silver-spoon-sucker.
On tax
“GST – if introduced – would not be effected abruptly, but very gently”
So, maybe they would introduce GST while the sales and service tax regimes are still in place? I don’t know. I’m dumbfounded. Or maybe its just a Dumb statement to begin with.
Categories: Thinking Out Loud · Unbelievable Acts
November 10, 2009 · 1 Comment
It seemed harmless at first sight; the proposal to “broaden the tax base… that tax at a fixed rate of 5% be imposed on gains from the disposal of real property” with a collection mechamism whereby the tax is collected through a withholding mechanism whereby the purchaser withholds 2% of the purchase value and pays to the Inland Revenue Board.
One month thereafter and one month before implementation date, here are some potential migraines to consider…
- All purchasers of real property or real property company (RPC) shares will be required to withhold 2% of the purchase price and remit the same to the IRB when the purchaser is unsure whether the disposer is subject to RPGT on the gain, or whether the disposer has got a gain from the sale, or whether the disposer is gonna or not gonna file their RPGT returns.
- Reread point (1). See any problems yet? RPC shares are shares in companies with at least 75% of their tangible assets being comprised of real property or RPC shares… now, do you see the problem?
- Reread point (1). See another problem? Where the purchaser is unsure, just withhold and remit to IRB. Imagine this scenario… investment dealers, banks, insurance companies, brokerage firms, any freakin’ person deciding to purchase an entire business aka balance sheet etc will now have to be wary of the lock, stock and barrel they’re purchasing or the thousands of shares traded in case there are RPC shares there and whether they may need to withhold 2% of that purchase price and remit to the IRB.
- Worse still, what about properties forclosed by banks for bad loans and mortgages? How would the “withholding” work? Has the bank “purchased” the property? How would the bank then have to get back the money they are trying to recover through an auction of the property on the basis that there was probably no gain to be taxed and that it should not even be taxed under RPGT in the first place?
And I’m sure there will be more. Those are just some I am able to pluck out so far.
Categories: Pudgy Budgie · Thinking Out Loud
And the announcement didn’t come from the Finance Ministry. Curiouser and curiouser…
Categories: Pudgy Budgie · Yes? No? Maybe?
November 2, 2009 · 1 Comment
Because the service tax license application form (electronic form at the very least) still requires “Race” of the board of directors of a company to be specified… from a very extensive list. Nevertheless, it’s still there.
Categories: Bad News · Yes? No? Maybe?